Hambatan Tak Terlihat: Rendahnya Literasi Hukum dan Akses Masyarakat terhadap Judicial Review di Indonesia – Analisis Yuridis Normatif untuk Reformasi Inklusif

Authors

  • Desi Puspita Anggerina Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar (Unma) Banten Program Pascasarjana
  • Mochamad Ridzky Salatun Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar (Unma) Banten Program Pascasarjana
  • Rifqy Afrizal Siddik Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar (Unma) Banten Program Pascasarjana
  • Toto Hartono Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar (Unma) Banten Program Pascasarjana
  • Luthfy Abbad Dudikoff Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar (Unma) Banten Program Pascasarjana
  • Ida Muidah Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar (Unma) Banten Program Pascasarjana
  • Firman Adi Candra Universitas Mathla'ul Anwar (Unma) Banten Program Pascasarjana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v8i1.10273

Keywords:

judicial review, legal literacy, public access, Constitutional Court.

Abstract

Judicial review, as a constitutional instrument in Indonesia, aims to uphold the supremacy of the 1945 Constitution (UUD 1945) and protect citizens' constitutional rights. However, low legal literacy and limited public access to this mechanism hinder effective public participation. This article analyzes these issues through a normative juridical approach using secondary data from journals, regulations, and court decisions. The findings indicate that limited understanding, complex procedures, and high costs lead to unequal access, where only influential groups dominate the judicial review of legislation. Recommendations include enhancing legal socialization and procedural reforms to democratize judicial review.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-02

How to Cite

Anggerina, D. P., Salatun, M. R., Siddik, R. A., Hartono, T., Dudikoff, L. A., Muidah, I., & Candra, F. A. (2026). Hambatan Tak Terlihat: Rendahnya Literasi Hukum dan Akses Masyarakat terhadap Judicial Review di Indonesia – Analisis Yuridis Normatif untuk Reformasi Inklusif. As-Syar I: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga , 8(1), 14–19 . https://doi.org/10.47467/as.v8i1.10273

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>