Analisis Manajemen Risiko Halal Meggunakan Metode SCOR dan HOR Pada UMKM Pengalengan Gudeg Bu Lies

Abstract

The halal food industry in Indonesia faces demands to maintain the halal status of products not only during the production process but also throughout the supply chain, including the receipt of ingredients, transportation, storage, and distribution. The Bu Lies Gudeg Canning MSME is committed to halal products; however, as part of its operations, it also receives food products from external parties that do not yet fully hold halal certification. This situation poses potential halal risks, particularly the risk of cross-contamination during transportation and ingredient handling. This study aims to identify halal risks in the operational activities of Bu Lies’s Gudeg Canning SME, determine the priority causes of these risks, and provide mitigation recommendations appropriate to the SME’s circumstances. The Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) method was used to map supply chain activities and identify risk events. Subsequently, factor analysis was used to narrow down the risk events based on questionnaire results, yielding 9 valid risk events from the initial 15 indicators. Furthermore, Phase 1 of the House of Risk (HOR) method was used to prioritize risk agents based on their Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP) values. The research results show that there are 15 risk agents, with the highest score for A7—transportation vehicles that have been used to carry goods of uncertain halal status—with an ARP value of 441, and for A8—transportation vehicles carrying raw materials that do not meet hygiene standards—with an ARP value of 378. Based on the Pareto analysis, these two risk agents are prioritized for mitigation. The proposed mitigation measures include designing partitions within the fleet to separate halal cargo, halal raw materials, food items that are not yet certified or verified as halal, and non-food items, as well as standard operating procedures (SOPs) for fleet sanitation and hygiene checklists to be followed before and after delivery. These proposals were designed with the limitations of MSMEs in mind so that they can be implemented without the need to procure new vehicles. The feasibility test results showed a difference in conditions before and after the implementation of the proposed mitigation measures; therefore, the proposed partition design and SOPs can be used as control strategies to minimize the potential for cross-contamination in transportation activities.