Analisis dan Perbandingan Algoritma SVR, XGBOOST, dan Lightgbm dalam Prediksi Cryptocurrency Ethereum

المؤلفون

  • Ryan Anthony Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Jechenthia Maria Taso Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Stephen Yohanes Christopher Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
  • Ridhwan Ardiyansyah Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47467/comit.v4i1.12413

الكلمات المفتاحية:

Ethereum, LightGBM, SVR, XGBoost.

الملخص

This study aims to analyze and compare the performance of three algorithms, namely Support Vector Regression (SVR) with a linear kernel, XGBoost, and LightGBM, in predicting the Price of Ethereum cryptocurrency based on daily historical data. The study uses Ethereum Price data in USD for the last five years obtained from the investing.com website. The variables used are Close, Open, High, and Low Prices. The study uses two data splitting scenarios: 80% training data and 20% testing data, and 70% training data and 30% testing data. This study also uses time step variations to test the effect of time dependency on algorithm performance. The results indicate that the LightGBM algorithm has the best performance compared to the other two algorithms with an average MAE value for High Price of 75.486, SVR has a value of 115.590, and XGBoost has a value of 77.314 in the 80% training data and 20% testing data split. In the 70% training data and 30% testing data split, the LightGBM algorithm still excels with an average MAE value for High Price of 78.228, SVR of 104.356, and XGBoost of 83.573. Other evaluations such as RMSE and R2 also show the superiority of the LightGBM algorithm. For the required computation time, the SVR algorithm outperforms the other two algorithms.

التنزيلات

بيانات التنزيل غير متوفرة بعد.

التنزيلات

منشور

2026-08-03

كيفية الاقتباس

Anthony, R., Maria Taso, J., Yohanes Christopher, S., & Ardiyansyah, R. (2026). Analisis dan Perbandingan Algoritma SVR, XGBOOST, dan Lightgbm dalam Prediksi Cryptocurrency Ethereum. Comit: Communication, Information and Technology Journal, 4(1), 29–46 . https://doi.org/10.47467/comit.v4i1.12413